Feldman, O. (Ed.). (2023). Political debasement:
Incivility, contempt, and humiliation in
parliamentary and public discourse.
Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Retrieved from https://acortar.link/c6I3g6
Ferrara, F. M., Haas, J. S., Peterson, A., &
Sattler, T. (2022). Exports vs. investment:
How political discourse shapes popular
support for external imbalances. Socio-
Economic Review, 20(4), 1961-1989.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab004
Gervais, B. T. (2019). Rousing the partisan
combatant: Elite incivility, anger, and
antideliberative attitudes. Political
Psychology, 40(3), 637–655.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12532
Herndon, A. (2023). In Search of Kamala Harris.
The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/10/magaz
ine/kamala-harris.html
Hickman, R., & Huaylla Sallo, K. (2022). The
political economy of streetspace reallocation
projects: Aldgate Square and Bank Junction,
London. Journal of Urban Design, 27(4),
397-420.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2022.2033
113
ITV News. (2023). Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak,
sits down with ITV News for an in depth
interview. Retrieved from
https://acortar.link/2NoauD
Konotop, О., Bondar, О., Terletska, L.,
Kyrychenko, S., & Ovsyanko, G. (2022).
Methods of using digital technologies for the
development of students’ listening
comprehension strategies in higher
educational institutions. Journal for
Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 13(3),
247-259.
https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2022.13.03.024
Lilja, M. (2022). Theorising resistance
formations: reverse discourses, spatial
resistance and networked dissent. Global
Society, 36(3), 309-329.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2022.2052
020
Lynggaard, K. (2019). Discourse analysis and
European Union politics. London: Palgrave
Macmillan. Retrieved from
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/978-
1-137-39326-5
Malnick, E. (2023). I look across the despatch
box at Keir Starmer and I don’t see any
principles. The Telegraph. Retrieved from
https://acortar.link/SprKng
Navera, G. S. (2021). The president as macho:
Machismo, misogyny, and the language of
toxic masculinity in Philippine presidential
discourse. In O. Feldman (Ed.), When
politicians talk: The cultural dynamics of
public speaking (pp. 187–202). Singapore:
Springer Nature Singapore.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3579-
3_11
O’Grady, T. (2022). The Transformation of
British Welfare Policy: Politics, Discourse,
and Public Opinion. Oxford (UK): Oxford
University Press. Retrieved from
https://acortar.link/Hm1qRl
Otto, L. P., Lecheler, S., & Schuck, A. R. (2020).
Is context the key? The (non-)differential
effects of mediated incivility in three
European countries. Political
Communication, 37(1), 88-107.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1663
324
Perreault, G., Kananovich, V., & Hackett, E.
(2023). Guarding the Firewall: How Political
Journalists distance themselves from the
editorial endorsement process. Journalism &
Mass Communication Quarterly, 100(2),
354-372. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221084609
Pickard, S., Bowman, B., & Arya, D. (2020).
“We are radical in our kindness”: The
political socialisation, motivations, demands
and protest actions of young environmental
activists in Britain. Youth and
Globalisation, 2(2), 251-280. Retrieved from
https://brill.com/view/journals/yogo/2/2/artic
le-p251_251.xml
Rangoni, S., Bedock, C., & Talukder, D. (2023).
More competent thus more legitimate? MPs’
discourses on deliberative mini-publics. Acta
Politica, 58(3), 531-551. Retrieved from
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41
269-021-00209-4
Richards-Gray, L. (2022). Political discourse and
gendered welfare reform: a case study of the
UK Coalition government. Journal of
Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 32(2),
358-376.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2020.1760
283
Roulin, N., Lukacik, E. R., Bourdage, J. S.,
Clow, L., Bakour, H., & Diaz, P. (2023). Bias
in the background? The role of background
information in asynchronous video
interviews. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 44(3), 458-475. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2680
Segev, E. (2020). Textual network analysis:
Detecting prevailing themes and biases in
international news and social
media. Sociology Compass, 14(4), e12779.
https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12779